Last updated on September 5th, 2019 at 08:37 pm
Up to very recently, conversion rate optimization (CRO) was dominated by consultants who were providing the optimization solutions as a blend of empirical experience with a little bit of technology. The practitioners were relying more on the art of persuasive copy writing and the best design practices, and less on the technology and scientific methods.
The advent of new multivariate testing technologies, adaptive multivariate testing in particular, is significantly impacting the industry’s best practices. Although they are still important and relevant, they are no longer dominant. Using traditional best practices is a great way to initialize the CRO journey but they are by no means the final destination.
New optimization technology is consistently revealing that what works for one company may not work for another. Even more subtle, two vendors selling the exactly the same type product, optimizing the very same type of web page elements, using the same marketing ideas, might get significantly different outcomes.
That is why three simple rules below are so important for opening doors for the use of technology and creating much higher value with the conversion rate optimization.
A: Maximize the performance of existing web pages before considering a new design
One of the biggest misconceptions in conversion rate optimization business is thinking that the only way that you can get higher page conversion rates is to completely re-design your web page or a complete website. This immediately sounds like a complicated and expensive endeavor that turns off the great majority e-merchants. They think: Not now. We have no time, money, or resources to do it.
The multivariate testing technology is revealing that your existing web pages have a lot of potential for improvement. By casting a wide net and experimenting with many small, almost invisible changes, you will almost certainly find a combination of these changes that produces a great increase in conversion rate.
The small numbers in the Relative Importance table are showing the difference in the conversion rate between a page that has one of the variations and the control (your existing web page). As you can see in this example, none of the new variations has had any significant impact individually.
But surprisingly, a combination of several small changes compounds to produce a very significant increase in the page conversion rate. Very few marketing professionals are aware of these multivariate testing methodology characteristics.
New Value:
- every web page has a great potential for higher conversion rate – all you have to do to unlock that potential is to experiment with many small changes
- you do not have to be a creative marketing genius to harness this value – there are no good or bad marketing ideas, nobody is by default right or wrong – multivariate testing is letting e-commerce owners learn from live web visitors about what they like or do not like
- verify new ideas before you re-design your website – often we hear e-merchants telling us that they are planning to design a new storefront look and feel and then optimize for higher conversion rate; seeing so many failed re-design initiatives the opposite should be the norm: test new ideas within your existing website, and once you confirm that they are working before you make a risky investment into a new website re-design
B: Be Different
During A-B or traditional multivariate tests you had to be prepared to experience a temporary dip in conversion rate during the optimization tests as a price of discovering a version of the page that will make money for you in the long run. This was happening because of the certainty that you will test more losers than winners and hence your conversion rate will temporarily suffer.
The fear of this testing risk was preventing many companies from even trying to optimize. And those who dare would often elect to try to minimize the risk by testing more of the same. Remember the definition of insanity: doing the same thing and expecting different results. In reality, to get great results you have to try some new and radically different ideas.
To deal with the temporary loss concerns, many vendors will either downplay its occurrence or they would try to spin it in a positive way, like it was done by a recent Ektron’s white paper: “Fail faster with multivariate testing“.
The adaptive multivariate testing technology is creating a breakthrough by its ability to eliminate this risk of testing. This technology is able to adapt to visitor’s behavior in real-time. The algorithm’s training period is very short (often no longer than a couple of days). After that, only page combinations that have high probability to beat the base line are tested. As a result, you will see an improvement in your conversion rate during the test itself.
New Value
- make money even as you test: in many cases,new sales generated during the initial 30-60 days of optimization can pay for all testing costs
- freedom to test: now you can test continually without concerns that you will lose money during the test
- freedom to test radical new ideas: if a radical idea is ‘crazy’ the system will detect and filter them out, leaving you with good material that will consistently outperform the control
C: Do not turn your optimization system off
A traditional approach to conversion rate optimization is a multi-step process: design the test, run the test, verify results, and then permanently implement the winning page.
With traditional optimization technologies you could not do it differently. These products are designed to act as testing tools and to passively measure the test outcomes.
To dramatize the difference between the adaptive multivariate testing approach and traditional testing methods we like to compare the traditional solution to a thermometer.
The adaptive method on the other side acts as an active component of the website that continually adopts itself to the most current visitor behavior. Hence, to stay in the same metaphor, we compare the adaptive approach to a thermostat. Like your home thermostat that is continually managing your energy consumption, your website thermostat will continually manage your online channel ROI.
Why is this significant?
Visitor behavior and associated web page conversion rates are continually changing. In such an environment, it is quite risky to drive your online channel by looking at a ‘rear view mirror’ (past performance data). Often, the best web combination is ‘dead on arrival’ and its performance after implementation is quite disappointing.
To make things even more confusing, the optimization tests are rarely producing a single winning page combination. Instead, it is quite common to get a half dozen page combinations with similar performance.
If you would analyze the composition of the good combinations you will quickly realize that they have a quite diverse makeup. This can be quite confusing. The people expect to get a single non-disputed winner or a group of pages that have a lot of elements in common.
A simple explanation for such an outcome is the non-homogeneous web traffic.
In the mix of different types of the web visitors, one page combination can be better this hour and another combination the next. With a traditional multivariate testing solution, this time changing behavior is not observed and typically the page combination with the highest probability to win is selected and implemented. If your web traffic changes, the new page is most likely sub-optimal and delivers much lower conversion rates than expected.
Get yourself a thermostat
Adaptive multivariate testing is simplifying the optimization process to only a setup step. Once activated, the system will adaptively search for the best performing page combinations and converge to the best performing combination or the group of the best performing combinations.
As the visitor’s behavior changes the system will continually adopt and show the page combination with the most current probability to win without need to physically implement the test results.
In essence, the adaptive system will continually react to market changes in a similar way to your house thermostat that will react to the changes in the environment temperature.
New Value:
- no need for an analyst – with traditional solutions you need an analyst to help you interpret the results; the adaptive testing solution is fully automated and it is managing your conversion rates without any need for the operator’s intervention
- no implementation cost – implementation of the winning page combination can be quite costly and can create delays
- a maximum performance at all time – unlike traditional technology, an adaptive solution is acting as auto-pilot and always keeping the performance and revenues at a maximum level
Conclusion
The goal of this article was not to minimize an importance of the experienced online marketer who is necessary for achieving great increases in the website conversion rate. Instead, we wanted to suggest an effective way of using adaptive multivariate testing technology to expand the potential of good marketing.
About the author: Zee is the CEO of Hiconversion, Inc. which he started in July of 2006. Hiconversion is a Florida based company that provides a game changing website optimization solution that is dramatically faster, easier to use, and delivered via software-as-a-service (SaaS) model. The company’s patented adaptive multivariate testing method breaks the primary website testing adoption barrier: the requirement for high traffic volume.
4 replies to "Conversion rate optimization best practices are dead – long live the best practices!"
RT @tomshark: Conversion rate optimization best practices are dead – long live the best practices! – via @twitoaster http://www.capturecommerce.com/blog/conv…
Many thanks for discussing such an informative article with all of us. I’ve bookmarked your blog will come back for a re-read again. Keep up the great work. We have a Dan Kennedy Copywriting seminar that we offer to our customers you can check it out here Copywriting Courses Visit This
I think that copy needs to be prioritised, interested to hear any other thoughts on Dan Kennedy..read quite a lot about him.
Been reading about Chris Cardell as well – anyone know much about him? DK and CC seem to take events together, marketing and copywriting events. Any views?